In evaluation terms, what helps maintain objectivity during assessments?

Maintaining objectivity during assessments is crucial for fair and accurate evaluation. Norms and expectations serve as standardized benchmarks against which performance or behaviors can be measured. They establish a common frame of reference that enables evaluators to assess individuals consistently, reducing personal biases that may arise from subjective interpretations. By relying on these established norms, evaluators can ensure that the assessments are aligned with clear, agreed-upon standards, allowing for an unbiased evaluation of individual performance relative to the expected outcomes.

The other options, while they may contribute to the evaluation process in different ways, do not specifically foster the same level of objectivity as norms and expectations. For instance, experiential feedback might be informative but can vary significantly based on personal experiences, which could introduce subjectivity. Individual preferences pertain to personal tastes and may not represent a fair evaluation criterion. Dynamic criteria can be useful for assessing ongoing or evolving performance, but they can also lead to inconsistencies if not anchored to stable norms. Thus, norms and expectations are essential for ensuring assessments are objective and standardized.